Jump to page content

Project completeness

Contents

Overview

The primary goal for the pylons section of this site is to visually illustrate every standard UK tower type by way of outline diagrams. Some non-standard types are included but many will not be, especially the more ad-hoc towers.

For 132 kV and above, this site contains at least the majority of the standard tower series that have ever existed, although not all are fully illustrated or even illustrated at all.

For 33 and 66 kV, the tower series listed below are only those for which it has been possible to assign some kind of a name. More series are known to exist but no means is yet available to name them.

Completeness chart

See the key below the chart for the details of each of the columns.

Designation Source Coverage Drawings needed Data needed Photography coverage Identity Notes FAO
33 and 66 kV (well-defined types)
Hebden Bridge–Elland None All C, S, D, A No photographs Mfr. contract
Milliken L134 GA/ED Fair Transposition C, V No photographs Mfr. contract SPEN
Milliken E102 single circuit GA/ED Good Earthing arms, lower angle GPO crossing if they existed C Minimal coverage Mfr. contract UKPN
Milliken E102 double circuit None None All C No photographs Mfr. contract Believed to exist, but formal connection between known towers and E102 is yet to be made
Milliken T163 GA/ED Poor All except D3 and D10 C, V No photographs Mfr. contract
Milliken T169 None All C, S, D, A No photographs Mfr. contract NIE Networks
SEE SL2 GA/ED Poor All except D60 C, V No photographs Contract UKPN
Milliken K721 Various Poor All C No photographs Mfr. contract NPG
SEE SL3(b) GA/ED Poor S3, S20, ST, GPO crossing, terminal C, V Minimal coverage Contract UKPN
SEE SL4 GA/ED Poor Line, D30, S60, ST C, V No photographs Contract UKPN
J L Eve C15 0.1 GA/ED Poor D60, DL, DT Fair coverage Mfr. drawings
J L Eve C15 0.15 Various Fair D60, DL, DT Fair coverage Mfr. drawings
Pontypridd None All C, V, S, D, A No photographs NGED
Milliken E177 single circuit Street View Poor All C No photographs Mfr. contract SSEN South
Milliken E177 double circuit GA/ED Good D60 GPO crossing, D90, D90 GPO crossing
Milliken E177 four circuit Other Poor All
SEE SL6 Street View Bad All C, D No photographs Contract UKPN
SEE SL8 GA/ED Poor All except terminal C Minimal coverage Contract UKPN
Blaw Knox K1373 GA/ED Complete C No photographs
Blaw Knox K4611 GA/ED Fair C Minimal coverage Update and completion from GA/ED queued
NWE SL4 GA/ED Fair Terminal, GPO crossing C, V No photographs Contract
J L Eve C333 GA/ED Fair Terminal C, A No photographs Mfr. drawing range
Abergavenny and Cwmbran Street View Fair All C, V Good coverage Location-based moniker NGED
Preston Corporation Street View Fair All C, D No photographs Customer Double earthwire barely covered (now all demolished or downgraded) ENWL
Coventry None All C, V, S, D, A No photographs NGED
Riley and Neate H99 GA/ED Good 72° towers No photographs Mfr. contract NPG
Blaw Knox K9906 GA/ED Complete C Reasonable to good coverage Mfr. contract
L4(m) 66 GA/ED Fair D60, production terminal types; all GA&ED No photographs Official NPG
110 kV (Northern Ireland)
Blaw Knox K1641 Various Good S30, S60, S90 C No photographs Unknown SCT appears to be a standard 132 kV type … NIE Networks
Belfast four-circuit None All C, D Reasonable to good coverage Route-based moniker NIE Networks
132 kV
CS-PL1 Other Fair All Minimal coverage Problematic No trace so far of a B2 type (equivalent to D10)
SS-PL1 Various Good D30, S30, S60, S90, ST; 6 foot peak ST (e.g. Glenlee) Partial coverage Problematic This is a mish-mash of separate, related series
Stafford–Wolverhampton S2 Street View Good S2 No photographs ? Substitute S2 tower for CE PL1 used between Stafford and Wolverhampton NGED
NWE PL2 GA/ED Poor Towers 3, B15, B16, F6, F7, 16–20, 112–113, 217, J3J4 No photographs Contract
Rannoch–Abernethy Street View Good All C, D, A Good coverage Route-based moniker SSEN
SEE PL1a/MEE PL1 Various Good All except D2, DT, S2; DX especially Partial coverage Contract UKPN
NPG
SEE PL1(b) Various Good S30, S60, terminal towers Partial coverage Contract UKPN
Spey Valley GA/ED Fair Short peaks; spires; 132/132 transposition Minimal coverage Contract Name taken from the drawings SSEN
CE PL3 Various Poor All except D2, D30 and DD30 Minimal coverage Contract NGED
PL4/WGR double circuit Tower Bible Good Terminal towers Partial coverage Convention Redraw from GA/ED queued
PL4/WGR single circuit Various Poor All except S60 SEW No photographs Also known as PL9/SWE PL9, Blaw Knox K5297
Lydney Photos Poor All S, D, A Good coverage Location-based moniker Nothing known about the reason for this line or its identity NGED
PL7 Tower Bible Good Terminal tower adaptations Partial coverage Convention Redraw from GA/ED queued UKPN
Blaw Knox K5735 GA/ED Poor Single earthwire types; terminal C No photographs Mfr. drawings ENWL
PL16 (double circuit only) GA/ED Good Gantries, DC types Good coverage Problematic
Blaw Knox K1201 GA/ED Good SS10, SS60, S90, SS90 Minimal coverage Contested PL16/STL1 naming dispute SSEN
Blaw Knox K1420 GA/ED Good S2; wood pole intermediates Minimal coverage Contested PL16/STL1 naming dispute SSEN
J L Eve C534 (L16) GA/ED Good Good coverage Mfr. contract
J L Eve C670 GA/ED Complete Good coverage Mfr. contract
J L Eve C772 Other Poor D2, D10, D30, D60 No photographs Mfr. contract PL16/STL1 naming dispute SSEN
Inveraray–Taynuilt GA/ED Good Loch Awe crossing tower dimensions Minimal coverage Route-based moniker SSEN
J L Eve C1415 GA/ED Good DT extended top crossarms Minimal coverage Contested Drawn from C1824; PL16/STL1 naming dispute SSEN
Quoich–Broadford GA/ED Complete Minimal coverage Route-based moniker
L7 Key diagrams † Good Good coverage Official Redraw from GA/ED queued
L4(m) Key diagrams † Good Partial coverage Official Redraw from GA/ED stalled due to major source material errors
275 and 400 kV
L34 Mixed Good All No photographs Contract
L66 / L66/89 / L1 Key diagrams Complete Minimal coverage Contract Redraw from GA/ED queued
L2 Various Good All Good coverage Official
L3, Blaw Knox Various Good All Partial coverage Official
L3, J L Eve GA/ED Good ST, any gantries No photographs Official
Blaw Knox T1521 GA/ED Unknown All No photographs Mfr. contract Scope of contract unknown SSEN
Blaw Knox T1648 GA/ED Unknown All Minimal coverage Mfr. contract Scope of contract unknown SSEN
Blaw Knox T2175 Key diagrams Good Minimal coverage Mfr. contract GA&ED believed to be lost forever
L6, Balfour Beatty Key diagrams † Good All Partial coverage Official
L6, BICC Key diagrams † Good All No photographs Official
L6, Blaw-Knox Key diagrams † Good All Minimal coverage Official
L6, J L Eve Key diagrams Fair All No photographs Official
L6(c) Key diagrams Good All No photographs Official
L6(m) Key diagrams † Fair All No photographs Official
L8 Key diagrams † Good All Minimal coverage Official
L8(c) Modified Key diagrams † Unknown All No photographs Official L8 single circuit
L8 R Other material Poor All No photographs Official L8 275 kV–only reduced height
L9 (GA/ED) (Complete) No photographs Official L9(c) LD redraw from GA/ED failed due to major source material errors
L12 Other Good ? No photographs Official Is there any visual difference with L12X?
L12 low-height Other Good All Minimal coverage Official
Coylton–Auchencrosh Key diagrams Complete No photographs Route-based moniker
L13 Public material Poor All No photographs Official
SSE400 Key diagrams Complete Lower-strength D Minimal coverage Official SSEN
C-IVI-1 Various Good No photographs Official Under construction
AS4 Key diagrams Complete No photographs Official Not yet constructed

Key

Designation

The designation chosen for this site; these range from official to completely ad-hoc.

Source

All the diagrams on the site should be traced from general arrangement and erection diagrams, but in many instances, less accurate sources have been used.

GA/ED
Diagrams traced from official general arrangement and/or erection diagrams. Older GA/ED drawings are prone to exaggerated dimensions for various tower components, requiring the diagrams on this site to be adjusted according to visual sources to be closer to the actual design. This is particularly problematic with tower peaks, especially Milliken PL1 suites.
Key diagrams
Official drawings in outline form, often known as key diagrams, outline diagrams or key erection diagrams. These are fairly accurate but may contain errors, especially where marked †.
Tower Bible
Either Jon Bruford’s original [Tower Bible] or Matt’s enhanced version (less incomplete than the original). The source material is in wireframe form only and (especially where marked †) inaccurate.
Street View
Google Street View, owing to not having neither unlimited time and money nor a teleporter. Tracing from Street View introduces various errors and does not allow the tower sizes to be determined.
Photos
Photographs only
Various
Multiple source types
Other
Other material, e.g. National Grid or SSEN publicly-available stakeholder material; these can be considerably inaccurate (especially where marked †).

Coverage

Coverage refers exclusively to the completeness level of a tower suite, regardless of the quality of source material. Coverage is relative to an estimate of what tower types exist within the suite, as this information is seldom available.

Entries in brackets (parentheses) denote the coverage status once all queued material has been processed.

None
No diagrams attempted due to lack of material and size data
Poor
Only a small portion of the series has been covered due to lack of material
Fair
Most tower types are illustrated but one or more important types remain missing
Good
All standard types are covered; gaps may still exist for less-common types such as gantries or crossing towers
Complete
Believed to be complete
Unknown
Insufficient data to determine what the tower suite contains

Drawings needed

This column indicates the towers for which drawings are needed, preferably general arrangement and erection diagrams. For towers where the source is already noted as an outline source (key diagrams, Tower Bible etc), then a general arrangement or erection diagram is needed for greater accuracy. For tower types where the source is only visual (e.g. Street View) or where there is no source at all, then any reasonable material is acceptable, as lower-accuracy material can be used as a stop-gap.

Needed less
Needed
Needed more
Work done

Data needed

Abbreviated in the table to save space:

C
Design conductors (phase and earthwire), preferably including the modern variant codename, e.g. 0.175″ SCA (now 175 mm² Lynx ACSR); Lynx is assumed for all 132 kV types where not specified on the drawings
V
Design voltage
S
The contract (such as SEE SL1) for which the towers were designed
D
Tower type designations
A
Age of design

Photography coverage

No photographs
No photographs at all. This normally indicates a tower type that is out of travel range, but it can also be due to the extinction of a tower type (for which licensable historic photos may exist).
Minimal coverage
Minimal coverage, often just the header image.
Partial coverage
Partial coverage: some tower types remain missing.
Good coverage
Good coverage; one or more types may still be missing but there is a good visual depiction of the series.

Identity

Per industry convention, the identity should represent the oldest contract for which the towers were designed. Determining this original contract is often impossible.

Official
The designation used on this site is the official designation for the tower series in question.
Mfr. contract
The series is designated per the manufacturer’s contract number (Milliken and Blaw Knox). Prior to the 1950s there is no guarantee that the same towers do not exist in a previous contract.
Mfr. drawing range
The series is designated per the manufacturer’s drawing number range (J L Eve) — the same tower suite may have multiple sets of drawings and there is no guarantee that the drawing set used for this site is the original set for the tower series in question.
Contract
The series is designated per the contract (e.g. SEE SL4, CE PL3) for which the drawings are understood or assumed to have been produced. The same towers can exist in multiple contracts and there is no guarantee that the same tower designs don’t also exist in an earlier contract.
Convention
Conventional name within the industry.
Route-based moniker
The tower suite has been assigned a name within this site based on the endpoints of the route due to lack of source material; for tower suites specific to a single line, these names will be retained for ease of use compared to memorising manufacturer contract numbers, unless there is good evidence of a more appropriate name.
Location-based moniker
As above, but where the original routes are not known due to partial demolition of the original line.
Problematic
One or more problems exist with determining the identity, for example industry abuse (as with “PL16”) or where more work is needed for clarity (K1373 and K4611 appear to be overlapping contracts).
Contested
The identity of the tower suite is disputed