Project completeness
Contents
Overview
The primary goal for the pylons section of this site is to visually illustrate every standard UK tower type by way of outline diagrams. Some non-standard types are included but many will not be, especially the more ad-hoc towers.
For 132 kV and above, this site contains at least the majority of the standard tower series that have ever existed, although not all are fully illustrated or even illustrated at all.
For 33 and 66 kV, the tower series listed below are only those for which it has been possible to assign some kind of a name. More series are known to exist but no means is yet available to name them.
Completeness chart
See the key below the chart for the details of each of the columns.
| Designation | Source | Coverage | Drawings needed | Data needed | Identity | Notes | FAO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 and 66 kV (well-defined types) | ||||||||
| Hebden Bridge–Elland | — | None | All | C, S, D, A | Mfr. contract | |||
| Milliken L134 | GA/ED | Fair | Transposition | C, V | Mfr. contract | |||
| Milliken E102 single circuit | GA/ED | Good | Earthing arms, lower angle GPO crossing if they existed | C | Mfr. contract | |||
| Milliken E102 double circuit | None | None | All | C | Mfr. contract | Believed to exist, but formal connection between known towers and E102 is yet to be made | ||
| Milliken T163 | GA/ED | Poor | All except D3 and D10 | C, V | Mfr. contract | |||
| Milliken T169 | — | None | All | C, S, D, A | Mfr. contract | |||
| SEE SL2 | GA/ED | Poor | All except D60 | C, V | Contract | |||
| Milliken K721 | Various | Poor | All | C | Mfr. contract | |||
| SEE SL3(b) | GA/ED | Poor | S3, S20, ST, GPO crossing, terminal | C, V | Contract | |||
| SEE SL4 | GA/ED | Poor | Line, D30, S60, ST | C, V | Contract | |||
| J L Eve C15 0.1 | GA/ED | Poor | D60, DL, DT | Mfr. drawings | ||||
| J L Eve C15 0.15 | Various | Fair | D60, DL, DT | Mfr. drawings | ||||
| Pontypridd | — | None | All | C, V, S, D, A | ||||
| Milliken E177 single circuit | Street View | Poor | All | C | Mfr. contract | |||
| Milliken E177 double circuit | GA/ED | Good | D60 GPO crossing, D90, D90 GPO crossing | |||||
| Milliken E177 four circuit | Other | Poor | All | |||||
| SEE SL6 | Street View | Bad | All | C, D | Contract | |||
| SEE SL8 | GA/ED | Poor | All except terminal | C | Contract | |||
| Blaw Knox K1373 | GA/ED | Complete | C | |||||
| Blaw Knox K4611 | GA/ED | Fair | C | Update and completion from GA/ED queued | ||||
| NWE SL4 | GA/ED | Fair | Terminal, GPO crossing | C, V | Contract | |||
| J L Eve C333 | GA/ED | Fair | Terminal | C, A | Mfr. drawing range | |||
| Abergavenny and Cwmbran | Street View | Fair | All | C, V | Location-based moniker | |||
| Preston Corporation | Street View | Fair | All | C, D | Customer | Double earthwire barely covered (now all demolished or downgraded) | ||
| Coventry | — | None | All | C, V, S, D, A | ||||
| Riley and Neate H99 | GA/ED | Good | 72° towers | Mfr. contract | ||||
| Blaw Knox K9906 | GA/ED | Complete | — | C | Mfr. contract | |||
| L4(m) 66 | GA/ED | Fair | D60, production terminal types; all GA&ED | Official | ||||
| 110 kV (Northern Ireland) | ||||||||
| Blaw Knox K1641 | Various | Good | S30, S60, S90 | C | Unknown | SCT appears to be a standard 132 kV type … | ||
| Belfast four-circuit | — | None | All | C, D | Route-based moniker | |||
| 132 kV | ||||||||
| CS-PL1 | Other | Fair | All | Problematic | No trace so far of a B2 type (equivalent to D10) | |||
| SS-PL1 | Various | Good | D30, S30, S60, S90, ST; 6 foot peak ST (e.g. Glenlee) | Problematic | This is a mish-mash of separate, related series | |||
| Stafford–Wolverhampton S2 | Street View | Good | S2 | ? | Substitute S2 tower for CE PL1 used between Stafford and Wolverhampton | |||
| NWE PL2 | GA/ED | Poor | Towers 3, B15, B16, F6, F7, 16–20, 112–113, 217, J3J4 | Contract | ||||
| Rannoch–Abernethy | Street View | Good | All | C, D, A | Route-based moniker | |||
| SEE PL1a/MEE PL1 | Various | Good | All except D2, DT, S2; DX especially | Contract | ||||
| SEE PL1(b) | Various | Good | S30, S60, terminal towers | Contract | ||||
| Spey Valley | GA/ED | Fair | Short peaks; spires; 132/132 transposition | Contract | Name taken from the drawings | |||
| CE PL3 | Various | Poor | All except D2, D30 and DD30 | Contract | ||||
| PL4/WGR double circuit | Tower Bible | Good | Terminal towers | Convention | Redraw from GA/ED queued | |||
| PL4/WGR single circuit | Various | Poor | All except S60 SEW | Also known as PL9/SWE PL9, Blaw Knox K5297 | ||||
| Lydney | Photos | Poor | All | S, D, A | Location-based moniker | Nothing known about the reason for this line or its identity | ||
| PL7 | Tower Bible | Good | Terminal tower adaptations | Convention | Redraw from GA/ED queued | |||
| Blaw Knox K5735 | GA/ED | Poor | Single earthwire types; terminal | C | Mfr. drawings | |||
| PL16 (double circuit only) | GA/ED | Good | Gantries, DC types | Problematic | ||||
| Blaw Knox K1201 | GA/ED | Good | SS10, SS60, S90, SS90 | Contested | PL16/STL1 naming dispute | |||
| Blaw Knox K1420 | GA/ED | Good | S2; wood pole intermediates | Contested | PL16/STL1 naming dispute | |||
| J L Eve C534 (L16) | GA/ED | Good | — | Mfr. contract | ||||
| J L Eve C670 | GA/ED | Complete | — | Mfr. contract | ||||
| J L Eve C772 | Other | Poor | D2, D10, D30, D60 | Mfr. contract | PL16/STL1 naming dispute | |||
| Inveraray–Taynuilt | GA/ED | Good | Loch Awe crossing tower dimensions | Route-based moniker | ||||
| J L Eve C1415 | GA/ED | Good | DT extended top crossarms | Contested | Drawn from C1824; PL16/STL1 naming dispute | |||
| Quoich–Broadford | GA/ED | Complete | — | Route-based moniker | ||||
| L7 | Key diagrams † | Good | — | Official | Redraw from GA/ED queued | |||
| L4(m) | Key diagrams † | Good | — | Official | Redraw from GA/ED stalled due to major source material errors | |||
| 275 and 400 kV | ||||||||
| L34 | Mixed | Good | All | Contract | ||||
| L66 / L66/89 / L1 | Key diagrams | Complete | — | Contract | Redraw from GA/ED queued | |||
| L2 | Various | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L3, Blaw Knox | Various | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L3, J L Eve | GA/ED | Good | ST, any gantries | Official | ||||
| Blaw Knox T1521 | GA/ED | Unknown | All | Mfr. contract | Scope of contract unknown | |||
| Blaw Knox T1648 | GA/ED | Unknown | All | Mfr. contract | Scope of contract unknown | |||
| Blaw Knox T2175 | Key diagrams | Good | — | Mfr. contract | GA&ED believed to be lost forever | |||
| L6, Balfour Beatty | Key diagrams † | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L6, BICC | Key diagrams † | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L6, Blaw-Knox | Key diagrams † | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L6, J L Eve | Key diagrams | Fair | All | Official | ||||
| L6(c) | Key diagrams | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L6(m) | Key diagrams † | Fair | All | Official | ||||
| L8 | Key diagrams † | Good | All | Official | ||||
| L8(c) Modified | Key diagrams † | Unknown | All | Official | L8 single circuit | |||
| L8 R | Other material | Poor | All | Official | L8 275 kV–only reduced height | |||
| L9 | (GA/ED) | (Complete) | — | Official | L9(c) LD redraw from GA/ED failed due to major source material errors | |||
| L12 | Other | Good | ? | Official | Is there any visual difference with L12X? | |||
| L12 low-height | Other | Good | All | Official | ||||
| Coylton–Auchencrosh | Key diagrams | Complete | — | Route-based moniker | ||||
| L13 | Public material | Poor | All | Official | ||||
| SSE400 | Key diagrams | Complete | Lower-strength D | Official | ||||
| C-IVI-1 | Various | Good | — | Official | Under construction | |||
| AS4 | Key diagrams | Complete | Official | Not yet constructed | ||||
Key
Designation
The designation chosen for this site; these range from official to completely ad-hoc.
Source
All the diagrams on the site should be traced from general arrangement and erection diagrams, but in many instances, less accurate sources have been used.
- GA/ED
- Diagrams traced from official general arrangement and/or erection diagrams. Older GA/ED drawings are prone to exaggerated dimensions for various tower components, requiring the diagrams on this site to be adjusted according to visual sources to be closer to the actual design. This is particularly problematic with tower peaks, especially Milliken PL1 suites.
- Key diagrams
- Official drawings in outline form, often known as key diagrams, outline diagrams or key erection diagrams. These are fairly accurate but may contain errors, especially where marked †.
- Tower Bible
- Either Jon Bruford’s original [Tower Bible] or Matt’s enhanced version (less incomplete than the original). The source material is in wireframe form only and (especially where marked †) inaccurate.
- Street View
- Google Street View, owing to not having neither unlimited time and money nor a teleporter. Tracing from Street View introduces various errors and does not allow the tower sizes to be determined.
- Photos
- Photographs only
- Various
- Multiple source types
- Other
- Other material, e.g. National Grid or SSEN publicly-available stakeholder material; these can be considerably inaccurate (especially where marked †).
Coverage
Coverage refers exclusively to the completeness level of a tower suite, regardless of the quality of source material. Coverage is relative to an estimate of what tower types exist within the suite, as this information is seldom available.
Entries in brackets (parentheses) denote the coverage status once all queued material has been processed.
- None
- No diagrams attempted due to lack of material and size data
- Poor
- Only a small portion of the series has been covered due to lack of material
- Fair
- Most tower types are illustrated but one or more important types remain missing
- Good
- All standard types are covered; gaps may still exist for less-common types such as gantries or crossing towers
- Complete
- Believed to be complete
- Unknown
- Insufficient data to determine what the tower suite contains
Drawings needed
This column indicates the towers for which drawings are needed, preferably general arrangement and erection diagrams. For towers where the source is already noted as an outline source (key diagrams, Tower Bible etc), then a general arrangement or erection diagram is needed for greater accuracy. For tower types where the source is only visual (e.g. Street View) or where there is no source at all, then any reasonable material is acceptable, as lower-accuracy material can be used as a stop-gap.
| Needed less |
| Needed |
| Needed more |
| Work done |
Data needed
Abbreviated in the table to save space:
- C
- Design conductors (phase and earthwire), preferably including the modern variant codename, e.g. 0.175□″ SCA (now 175 mm² Lynx ACSR); Lynx is assumed for all 132 kV types where not specified on the drawings
- V
- Design voltage
- S
- The contract (such as SEE SL1) for which the towers were designed
- D
- Tower type designations
- A
- Age of design
Photography coverage
- No photographs at all. This normally indicates a tower type that is out of travel range, but it can also be due to the extinction of a tower type (for which licensable historic photos may exist).
- Minimal coverage, often just the header image.
- Partial coverage: some tower types remain missing.
- Good coverage; one or more types may still be missing but there is a good visual depiction of the series.
Identity
Per industry convention, the identity should represent the oldest contract for which the towers were designed. Determining this original contract is often impossible.
- Official
- The designation used on this site is the official designation for the tower series in question.
- Mfr. contract
- The series is designated per the manufacturer’s contract number (Milliken and Blaw Knox). Prior to the 1950s there is no guarantee that the same towers do not exist in a previous contract.
- Mfr. drawing range
- The series is designated per the manufacturer’s drawing number range (J L Eve) — the same tower suite may have multiple sets of drawings and there is no guarantee that the drawing set used for this site is the original set for the tower series in question.
- Contract
- The series is designated per the contract (e.g. SEE SL4, CE PL3) for which the drawings are understood or assumed to have been produced. The same towers can exist in multiple contracts and there is no guarantee that the same tower designs don’t also exist in an earlier contract.
- Convention
- Conventional name within the industry.
- Route-based moniker
- The tower suite has been assigned a name within this site based on the endpoints of the route due to lack of source material; for tower suites specific to a single line, these names will be retained for ease of use compared to memorising manufacturer contract numbers, unless there is good evidence of a more appropriate name.
- Location-based moniker
- As above, but where the original routes are not known due to partial demolition of the original line.
- Problematic
- One or more problems exist with determining the identity, for example industry abuse (as with “PL16”) or where more work is needed for clarity (K1373 and K4611 appear to be overlapping contracts).
- Contested
- The identity of the tower suite is disputed